“Don’t let the world around you squeeze you into its own mould, but let God re-mould your minds from within...”
Romans 12:2

Hilary's Desk

On the matter of the Lancet retraction

Hilary Butler - Monday, February 01, 2010
The Lancet has retracted the 1998 paper (1). Now, all the pillorying and slandering of Andrew Wakefield will start in earnest. The question is, "How does Richard Horton manage to go to sleep each night?". And here's why.  In 2004, the Lancet "partially" retracted the paper, on the basis that Andrew Wakefield never declared to the Lancet, financial conflicts of interest. When confronted in front...

Continue Reading

WHOs Uber tax.

Hilary Butler - Friday, January 29, 2010
Just when you thought it couldn't get worse for WHO, it has. Perhaps they looked at the amount of money Bill Gates was slinging around at vaccines over the next ten years, and thought..."Well, if he gets that much from selling computers, then think how much we can rake off people who USE his computers, however they use them!!?!!"  Voila. Brilliant... What an idea. Let's tax every email, all int...

Continue Reading

Be a good little early bird please?

Hilary Butler - Monday, January 25, 2010
You know the old saying, “where there’s smoke there’s fire”. In the World Health Organisation’s case, it’s a blazing inferno. Not only is Dr Fukuda fighting for WHO’s reputation through clenched teeth, he appears not to realise just how deep is the hole he’s digging for himself is. What Fukuda also forgets is that not everyone is ignorant to the machinations of drug companies, so let’s take a w...

Continue Reading

More WHO swine flu porkies.

Hilary Butler - Wednesday, January 20, 2010
On 14th January 2010, the WHO put out a press release stating that they had not changed the definition of pandemic mid-way through the Swine flu, in order to ramp up sales of an unnecessary vaccine for a virus which did not fit their previous definition of the word "pandemic". Their porky comes after a European governing body announced a formal investigation of WHO for consistently scaremongeri...

Continue Reading

Will there be a whitewash, or action?

Hilary Butler - Sunday, January 17, 2010
The likely response from the Ministry of Health will be mathematical platitudes to the tune of lots of cervical cancer prevented; X percentage of adolescents have received (the first shot of) Gardasil, and X number of doses have been given, blah blah blah. But that’s a sop, and not nearly good enough. We’ve heard it all before, and we know it’s not what parents see. Twenty three years ago, wit...

Continue Reading

Jasmine

Hilary Butler - Thursday, January 14, 2010
Jasmine was a very healthy girl, with no history of any health issues at all. After her first Gardasil vaccine (NJ02260) on 18th September, Jasmine broke out with warts on her hands, and her skin and moods changed. The warts were burned off of the 20th October, and didn’t come back. After the second vaccine (NJ11440) on 18th November , her moods were worse, and the warts were back within two we...

Continue Reading

Stevie

Hilary Butler - Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Stevie had a history of being born premature, tonsils and appendix out; left alternating extropia, (which got worse after Gardasil); allergy to citrus, and like her brother, didn’t handle the babyhood vaccines easily. She spiked high temperatures and cried a lot. Stevie also has an anti-trypsin MZ type deficiency, which meant that she was often prescribed antibiotics early in infections or they...

Continue Reading

Challenge dechallenge rechallenge

Hilary Butler - Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Ever heard of something called “challenge”, “dechallenge” … “rechallenge” (CDR)? It goes like this. Give a person like me, antibiotics (challenge), and the body happens to go nuts. Big rash (urticaria). But as a doc you aren’t sure, so you stop the drug for a while (dechallenge), and then give it again (rechallenge). Result = Big rash, face and neck swells and I can't breath. The rechallenge pr...

Continue Reading

Part Eight Gardasil and Mark Probert

Hilary Butler - Sunday, January 10, 2010
Yes, Mark we were waiting for the first utterance from vaccine defenders.  1.         The Renata's are actually PRO-vaccine... that's why the girl got vaccinated... she trusted vaccines... she trusted the system... in fact all of those affected by vaccines were pro-vaccine... otherwise they wouldn't have been vaccinated.   2.         If symptoms appear soon after a medication of any kind is it...

Continue Reading

Part Seven Gardasil and the Harper

Hilary Butler - Saturday, January 09, 2010
In October 2009, Dr Diana Harper, the lead researcher in the development of both Gardasil and Cervarix, addressed a conference intended to promote vaccines . (Just in case it disappears, I've pdf'd it here.)  Instead, the data she presented, left the doctors in the audience, wondering why HPV vaccines were used in developed countries at all. Why did Dr Diana Harper, yet again, spill the beans?...

Continue Reading

Part Six Some more of the iceberg

Hilary Butler - Saturday, January 09, 2010
Jasmine is not alone. But her mother is the first who has decided to go public with all her information. The details of a second serious Gardasil reaction will be posted later this week. Beyond Conformity will also be detailing other cases in the future, if the others think it's worth it.  They will be watching carefully, to see what the reaction of politicians and the medical profession is to...

Continue Reading

Part Five Jasmine, the tip of the iceberg

Hilary Butler - Friday, January 08, 2010
What follows is a letter to Dr Stewart Jessamine which gives a overview of the issues as they stand today: Dear Dr Jessamine, I have been working with Rhonda Renata since October, regarding her daughter’s death following the Gardasil vaccination, and have permission to discuss her death, and for all information I have to be made public. This letter has been written with Rhonda, and all attach...

Continue Reading

Part Four Autopsy and Jasmine Renata

Hilary Butler - Tuesday, January 05, 2010
Rhonda’s focus turned to the question of “why did Gardasil do this and how?”. In reviewing Jasmine’s medical records and all the talks Rhonda and I had, I was most concerned at certain aspects of Jasmine’s last few months, in particular the deterioration of her ability to make decisions, and to work out how to do simple jobs which she had done since childhood. It seemed too me that apart from t...

Continue Reading

Part Two Reporting the Reaction

Hilary Butler - Tuesday, January 05, 2010
There are two possible scenarios here. Your doctor reports the reaction, but as an afterthought, you ask for a copy of that report. Sitting there, reading it, you are staggered. This report sounds like a completely different reaction to the one your child suffered! After all, local reaction and pain at injection site, just doesn’t come anywhere near what you are seeing in front of your eyes. (...

Continue Reading

Part One When your child has a vaccine reaction

Hilary Butler - Monday, January 04, 2010
How would you feel if your healthy child died, or had a serious reaction to Gardasil? What would you expect to happen in terms of your concerns, and your “need-to-know”? How would you go about finding closure? What are the obstacles along this way? PROBLEM NUMBER ONE: You. How could that be? Because one of the reasons you had Gardasil given to your child, (or any vaccine in the first place) ...

Continue Reading

Part Three Carm and Jasmine Renata

Hilary Butler - Monday, January 04, 2010
In October 2009, Rhonda Renata emailed me about the death of her daughter Jasmine on 22nd September 2009. She had emailed John Key, Tony Ryall, and a few others and had got the usual fluff political responses from a dogma-ingrained system. From the time of Jasmine’s death, she had scoured the internet and found many cases of Gardasil recipients who had had similar stories to Jasmine. She wanted...

Continue Reading

Part 4 of 4 Offiteerers beliefs

Hilary Butler - Sunday, November 29, 2009
WE mothers are not the crème de la crème of society. WE did not go to medical school. WE are mere mothers, who can’t possibly understand all medical science. And WE know this, because they infer so, in their medical articles about us. And in lay-press articles, we hear patronising messages such as vaccines being just like “hard hats”, “seat belts” and “steel-capped boots”. Strange. NONE of thos...

Continue Reading

Part 3 of 4 Offiteerers’ cognitive dissonance

Hilary Butler - Saturday, November 28, 2009
  If provaccine people saw that there were barking up the wrong tree, and acted on it, they would immediately be isolated from their peers as if they were some virulent plague. Their revered “experts” who are pretty much the only social group they have known for years, would all look at them, point the finger and shout, “TRAITOR”. The "turncoat" would lose all their friends (and income) in o...

Continue Reading

Part 1 of 4 Offiteerers’ remorse

Hilary Butler - Thursday, November 26, 2009
At a recent annual provaccine conference, it is reported that delegates expressed remorse at “strong arm” tactics. Could it be that the MenZB vaccination campaign, and the latest Gardasil efforts, have seriously backfired in their faces? People are sick of being emotionally blackmailed with drama-queen DVD’s about “How you will die if you don’t” or “Vaccination is the right thing to do, because...

Continue Reading