Where are the skeptics, when it comes to looking at the “responsibility” of using intravenous vitamin C in serious illness? Where you’d predict them to be. Shoring up the medical system like good little marionettes.
My thoughts on IV vitamin C in serious illness are here. For anyone wanting to know more about the science in terms of recently published books, I’d recommend “The Cancer Breakthrough” by Drs Steve Hickey and Hilary Roberts
The skeptics blather about it all, started here at sciblogs
The skeptic autopilot mindset ( the medical profession is god and everything else is tripe), comes to the fore with their replies on Investigate’s website.
At first I laughed. But the problem is that the arrogance of ignorance is not a laughing matter. When the average person believes the sort of medical group-thunk which constantly drips from conformed pens of so-called skeptics, the winners are the local mortuary.
I’m sure Al Gore et al, are very grateful for every possible death at the hands of conventional (or other) medicine, no matter how. After all, in the battle against global warming, every death is a bonus, right?
Question: "Why did paracetamol apparently knock Allan Smith out, stone cold?"
Another question: "Why do medical doctors, and the Health Department continue, in the face of overwhelming medical literature, to print pamphlets and advice stating that paracetamol used during fever is safe and effective?"
Yet another question: "Might the reason no-one tells the truth, because they don't want to upset the industry?"
Oh yeah. I guess they will call that evidence right under any sane person’s nose a “conspiracy theory”?
Part four coming up soon!
