Hilary's Desk

An Australian website, is indulging what I call Orwellian "Department of Truth" speak, where the "truth" is avoided at all costs while decoy blame is laid elsewhere.  This is really a 2012 version of "medieval - speak".  Let me explain. First, let's look at the Herald Sun's show and tell. The very first thing you see is a child being vaccinated... ...and in the fir...

Continue Reading

All GP practices have received this letter dated 25 July, 2012. Very interesting. See this? The national coverage for two-year-old children by ethnicity is; Maori 92 percent, Pacific 97 percent, Asian 98 percent and NZ European 93 percent. This is a dramatic improvement in coverage for all of these groups since 2007. Meanwhile, they continue to ramp up the "whooping cough" epidemic...

Continue Reading

Yesterday I wrote a blog about the Sunday Herald flu propaganda, which resulted in the Herald removing the original article and replacing the Sunday on Herald emotional blackmail with different Pap. Not content with that, the vaccine "stakeholders" must have also said, "Oi, while we're on the phone, can we rope in Rudman?  He's pretty gullible..." and on cue, he pr...

Continue Reading

Today, the Herald printed it's usual annual flu propaganda (I've removed the URL) and a private email to the reporters who put their names to it, was returned. The Herald doesn't allow enough words on the comment facility to deal with the issues, and they only want videos or photos, not facts. Therefore, this blog will address the issues. Addendum 22 July 2012.  The HERALD removed the o...

Continue Reading

There is no place for pro/anti vaccine divides, when it comes to allegations of corporate fraud. Yet all across the media, the focus of the discussion about the Merck lawsuit is not to really discuss the issue, but to slap the "vaccine foes". The first example came out loud and clear in Forbes magazine. You don't have to read further than the title, to know where Gergana Kole...

Continue Reading

There is no place for pro/anti vaccine divides, when it comes to allegations of corporate fraud. Yet all across the media, the focus of the discussion about the Merck lawsuit is not to really discuss the issue, but to slap the "vaccine foes". The first example came out loud and clear in Forbes magazine. You don't have to read further than the title, to know where Gergana Kole...

Continue Reading

Way back in 2004, a group of New Zealanders learned what it meant to be hit over the head by Big Pharma. Pfizer to be precise. While IAS was Pfizer's actual target, in reality, I was the bull's eye, because the information was written by me, and therefore, I had most of the references in order to defend the complaint. I had written, and made comments based on the very well d...

Continue Reading

So what's the big deal, if as alleged in my previous blog, Merck did actually seriously muck around with the efficacy test, cook the books, invent figures, and produce MMR with a dud Mumps component? After all...when did you last hear of anyone dying from Mumps?  (I never did even before the MMR was introduced in 1991, but that's another story.)  Will this court case succeed?&...

Continue Reading

On April 27, 2012, a formal complaint was filed in the Eastern Pennsylvania District Court accusing Merck of a longstanding scheme to mislead and defraud Government health authorities worldwide. Two of Merck’s former employees have accused the pharmaceutical giant of marketing multivalent MMR vaccines under false pretenses. According to the complaint, these vaccines have been mislabe...

Continue Reading

This morning, someone asked me, "Why are the whooping cough rates so high in Europeans?"  I answered that I didn't know.  But while studying the Whooping cough weekly report, dated 8th June 2012, something jumped out like a bolt out of the blue and it was this graph:   Hmmm... interesting.  Then later in the report came this series of graphs which rang more bells and ...

Continue Reading

This blog is a follow on from the MOH diagnosis change taking effect from 21 May 2012 blog. Up until yesterday, the reports I'd concentrated on, were the ESR WEEKLY PERTUSSIS.  After reading the diagnostic change blog, a vigilant reader gave a timely reminder that the reports needing reviewing, were the ESR MONTHLY REPORTS . Solomon's mine, indeed. Starting from January 201...

Continue Reading

On 31 May, 2012, the New Zealand Ministry of Health made the astonishing decision to change the diagnostic criteria for whooping cough. These were the old criteria for a confirmed or probable case: "Confirmed: A clinically compatible illness that is laboratory confirmed by isolation of B. pertussis from a pernasal swab, or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed case. Probable: Cough...

Continue Reading

You have got to love it when Canadian scientists spend taxpayers money to come up with "science" like this: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36880. Epub 2012 May 30. Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal god. Norenzayan A, Gervais WM, Trzesniewski KH. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Abstract: Religious believers intuitively conc...

Continue Reading

Predicting the future of whooping cough is pretty simple. It will follow the mantra of the past, because to do otherwise would involve massive loss of face. Mainstream treatment: More of the same. Antibiotics on antibiotics without regard to the fact that they don't work and cause far bigger problems. A continual refusal to look at any treatment that doesn't come from the "Merck Manual". ...

Continue Reading

You will better understand these blogs if you study each link.  In a letter dated 18 May 2012, the Ministry of Health wrote: The pertussis containing vaccines are effective but do not protect all babies. The pertussis vaccine currently used in New Zealand and other developed countries offers protection of around 84 percent after three doses….. Adults immunisation is recommended for...

Continue Reading

Mainstream medical treatment of whooping cough is using antibiotics and "palliative" care.  First up...., it doesn't work.  They know that..., I know that..., but they won't tell you that, for the simple reason that... they have NOTHING else to offer you. When you walk into your doctor's office, the first thing they do- assuming they are even able to diagnose whooping cough co...

Continue Reading

There are none so blind as the medical profession who both refuse to see, and cannot understand why they CANNOT see. Over the last few weeks, the phone lines have run hot in this house, with many families contacting us for advice. My husband and I have talked with parents dealing with whooping cough over the last 30 years. We've also watched, first hand, the INABILITY of many doctors to eithe...

Continue Reading

(You will better understand these blogs if you study each link).  In a letter dated 18 May 2012, the Ministry of Health wrote: The pertussis containing vaccines are effective but do not protect all babies. The pertussis vaccine currently used in New Zealand and other developed countries offers protection of around 84 percent after three doses….. Adults immunisation is rec...

Continue Reading

It will be easier to understand this blog if you read all the material embedded.  In a letter dated 18 May 2012, the Ministry of Health wrote: The pertussis containing vaccines are effective but do not protect all babies. The pertussis vaccine currently used in New Zealand and other developed countries offers protection of around 84 percent after three doses….. Adults immunisatio...

Continue Reading